Native
American Inequality and the Media:
Anything
for a Laugh
Written By: Tori Palmberg
The television show, King
of the Hill, is an adult animated
Photo from wiki.com |
situation comedy that has been on the air since 1997 and now airs as re-run’s on many
cable stations. The show features the Hill
family, Hank and Peggy (and their son Bobby), as middle-class Texan Methodists
who spend a great deal of their time interacting with their neighbors who
represent a diverse cast of stereotypical characters including the portrayal of
the ignorant redneck, a rich, educated, and obnoxious Asian business owner, and
a lustful, wise, loner Native American character by the name of John Redcorn.
Physical Appearance
This character is a gross conformity to many Native
American stereotypes perpetuated in today’s pop culture. From a physical
perspective, John Redcorn embodies a uniformed look that the media uses to
portray all types of Native Americans. Often he is seen wearing a leather vest
or sometimes a suede fringe jacket (for more formal occasions), a colorful
beaded head band, feathered earrings, a bone choker necklace, and a medicine
pouch around his neck. His hair is long and often blowing in the wind and his
jeans are tight with some type of decorated belt buckle. From a historical
perspective, it is important to address the fact that Native Americans did not
all live in the same type of fashion and dress. Many television shows and movies
have portrayed Indian men all the same, with headdresses, headbands, feathers,
etc…, which is dress similar to those of the Plains tribes of Native Americans,
but very different from many other Native tribes and people. By making Indian
men all seem the same in media and on film we dehumanize and devalue their
individuality, while making it easier to continue to perpetuate stereotypes
that fuel inequality.
Personality and Behavior
In addition to physical appearance, the character of John
Redcorn displays a personality that has often been labeled as very
stereotypical. John Redcorn appears as a stoic and noble, wise, new age healer
that frequently arrives on the scene to offer moral advice when needed (though
many of his actions are amoral). He is also a “smooth talker” with the ladies
and has two children with two different married white women. The myth of Indian
men as wise sages with rigid dispositions or as lustful savages has been
perpetrated for decades on television and the big screen. The idea of Native
American’s as wise can be justified by some because it is a “positive”
stereotype that attempts to paint a group of people in an affirmative light.
Though many Native American’s have a rich cultural history steeped in
tradition, it would be incorrect to assume that all of them are brimming with
wisdom and spirituality.
These stereotypes are effective in widening the already
monumental gap of social and economic exclusion among Native Americans. By
classifying them in generalized categories related to appearance and behavior, and
by exploiting these stereotypes in a comedic fashion while achieving ratings
and profits, audiences members are entertained and left with lasting
impressions about what a Native American (man in this case) looks like and acts
like. Overall, John Redcorn is a symbol of how media has continued to
perpetuate and reproduce inequality regarding Native Americans. Whether we
think it’s funny or not, these stereotypes are harmful, and do nothing to
advance the fight against inequality and injustice.
That is true about the injustices of stereotypes of Native American people. It is a tool that teaches people that Native Americans are or act a certain way which is far from the truth but these stereotypes will inevitably be forced into nonexistence by Native Americans achieving success in the world, through interpersonal relationships and the education of our people who deserve as much respect as everyone else.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment.
Delete